Saturday, 26 August 2017

Women are the architect of the society


Women are the architect of the society
      On hearing the very topic we take a little bit pause thinking that how can a woman be an architect of a society? The question is very right. The answer is also transparent to it but we try to skip it. It is that not from the new dawn of India but from the ancient India women had served a primary role in building a society. It is not only in the case of India but also it is same around the whole world. As in during Independence era of India freedom fighters like Rani Lakshmibai, Sarojini Naidu, Kasturba Gandhi, Indira Gandhi, Kamla Nehru etc. They fought with the Britishers for the freedom of India. It is from the womb of a woman we have got many famous personalities both in male and female. In worldwide as well as global peacemaking associations we have got many female peacemakers over there. Women build bridges instead of walls as they serve as a peace educator both in their own house as well as in their own society. For women peace is the main priority over settling old scores. Women don’t seek revenge. Taking care of people’s needs is more important than being right about what happened in the past. Women are strong community activists, supporters of the peace marches, show up at rallies, stuff envelopes, keep their eyes and ears open and are attuned at the grass roots level. They often know of new developments in the works long before others as a result of their natural talents for networking. 
     Women are viewed as less threatening, often gaining access where men cannot go. Be it in academic field women have much excelled than men, Kalpana Chawla was the first Indian woman astronaut to go to space with her team. Not only in academics women has also excelled in the field of sports also, this year the first three finalists from India were women- P.V.Sindhu, Dipa Karmakar, Sakshi Malik. A girl before marriage not only takes care of her parental home but after her marriage she maintains the same bond with her in laws, husband and as a mother after her child is born. If it is a working woman she then has to take care of her household duties along with her official works. In short we can say that she is a Multi Tasker. Malala Yousafzai is a first teen age girl who not only fought for the education of the girls of her country but she also roused her voice for the education of the girls worldwide. The acid attack survivors also have the wish to get married and raise a family of her own. When the Government has the passed the Act of Women Empowerment, the women is not back in empowering themselves in every sphere they can and also they help the other women to get empowered. At the end of the day a men turns up to a women to help him from coming out of a serious problem keeping aside his ego. Last but not the least it can be said that had there been no women no society would have existed, and had a society been created without a woman it would had been a clear mess because women is the Soul of a society, how much we try to ignore her.






Thinking Activity on To The Lighthouse






1) Virginia Woolf’s representation of stream of consciousness in the novel “To the lighthouse” is such that the narrator speaks as the third person and portrays the characters and actions, or we can say that story develops through the flow of thoughts in the minds of the characters. Virginia Woolf has often used this technique in the novel to keep its special characters to be always within the consciousness of the chief characters. She tries to deconstruct the idea of patriarchal power structure. She tried to satirize power structure and it can also be said as stream of consciousness technique. For example Mrs.Ramsay wanted to make her daughter like her, so we can also compare Virginia and her daughters in the novel. The second thing is stream of consciousness. Stream of consciousness is a style of writing. In narrative technique there are two basic types of inferior monologue. Direct Inferior Monologue and Indirect Inferior Monologue. In this novel she also used technique of Brackets and Parenthesis.


5) The German term ‘kunstlerroman’ means struggle or development of an artist. Here in this novel same thing we can find in the character of Lily Briscoe that she has to struggle a lot as an artist. Throughout the novel we feel that she is in the process to complete the picture and at last she got her vision. We can say that the novel itself is struggle for Virginia Woolf for establishing her work among the male writers. And it reflects well in the character’s life. If we also look another character that is Mrs. Ramsay she also struggles a lot to make her life immortal by serving guests or pampering children or by doing match-making. 

8) Lily Briscoe said, “It was done, it was finished, I have had my vision.” According to me these line suggest the fulfillment of unknown desire that everyone seeks throughout the novel. Every character has some desire that gets fulfilled at last. As time passes everyone lost their desire and in the end they all got their vision. If we take an example of James life that the carving to go to the lighthouse is not there when he reached there. But suddenly when Mr Ramsay says that, “good job James.” It worked like a magical word for him. Lily was unable to complete the picture but at last she got her vision to complete it by drawing one single line. This helped to understand the reality that sometime we fail to connect the single line that fills the gap between some broken relations. Once Lily thought of her painting and her spirit soared above the superficialities of human relations and she thinks that, “such vast spaces between people came when certain solidity vanished.” It wasn’t so while Mrs Ramsay was alive. The blunder is happening in between characters because of Mrs Ramsay’s desire for selfhood. When Lily completes the picture by giving it final stroke and goes into her room and speaks, “Close Doors, Open Windows” symbolically suggests that Open Window stands for looking outside through it but we cannot get in through it and on the other side Close Door meant it doesn’t allow anyone to come and create disturbance in your personal life. But at last she addressed herself as- you are a fool, which meant she also accepted the way that she disliked.

9) In Literature symbol is something which signifies. The symbol of Refrigerator is a thing which preserves and it is the symbol of change also. Refrigerator signifies change in technology and presumably improving human culture. Refrigerator is the symbol for central character of the novel that is- Mrs.Ramsay who always tries to preserve the refine form of culture as it is her responsibility. It’s like a suggestion to James from Mrs.Ramsay to cut refrigerator from the catalog of Army and Navy. The refrigerator is an instrument of science, and it occupies the same sphere as the lighthouse.

10) In this novel we can find the representation of fairy tale told by Mrs. Ramsay to her children which shows barrenness and unreasonable demand from the husband which also depicts that how Mrs.Ramsay had to bent infront the bad mood of her husband because a woman should not speak or quarrel with anybody especially with her husband otherwise she would be known as an uncultured woman. So it shows suppressed desires of woman like Mrs. Ramsay. Mrs. Ramsay always used to pamper the ego of her husband, which we can also see find the story of fisherman’s wife. So cutting of the fish also highlights the male dominant and the danger of male willfulness. So we can say that fisherman’s fairy tale is related with Mrs. Ramsay and Lily also as she too had suppressed desires of womanhood. This is a great narrative quality found in the novel by Virginia Woolf.

Study of Existentialism




Studying Existentialism in the mode of Flipped Learning activity- 




Video 1-  Many a great thinker and writers such as- Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Dostoyevsky, Kafka, Heideggar and many more differ in their views but for all of them philosophical thinking and existentialism begin with the subject namely the individual. It could be seen as a triangle with- Individuality, freedom and passion as its three sides. Believing or not believing in God can only be possible when one thinks as an individual.

Video 2-  Our thinking is the base of every situation from where Absurdity started in life. It talks on lack of profound or prolific reason of living & it turns to an individual act may be Suicide. Reference from movie Stay also has such same ideas (An elegant suicide is the ultimate work of art.)

Video 3-   Absurdity is not in man or in the world but it's in both. If there is no human being then there would be no desire and then there would be no satisfaction & ultimately then there would be no philosophical suicide. Before facing problems one should know possible challenge as well as solution instead of facing it without a second thought. Religion believes that there is some reason beyond all but in actual sense there are no such reasons.

Video 4-    Existentialism is a not Nihilism. Dadaism is associated to Nihilism. Dadaism is a quest a change and values. In nihilism there is no meaning or purpose to life. One should create their values rather than following other’s values.

Video 5-    Existentialism is a philosophy which itself is dark or depressed. As we want some pillar to stand stable that’s why people chooses god as the pillar or finding a truth that is truth for us or embracing the absurd we feel relief by choosing any pillar. But what existentialism says here is that you have to be creator or developer or destroyer of your life. You have to live stable without any supporting pillars from outside. The only supporting pillar you can use it is you and yourself because everything which we seek outside comes from our inner self. 

Video 6-   Existentialism is opposed to Nihilism because Nietzsche believes that Nihilism comes after existentialist thinking. As per my understanding Nihilism shows us that everything is meaningless in the world and we are tempted by an objective scheme of things. And on the other hand existentialist thinker believes that there is no single meaning but we create our personal meaning for life. So in that point Nietzsche disagree with Nihilism because it ties our thinking ability and existentialism gives us more to look insight and judge critically. 

Video 7-   Existentialism shared a common concern that we can say it as human condition. Throughout our life we are in dilemma between life and purpose of life. We all are roaming throughout the life in search of the series of questions but we never meet with an appropriate answer.

Video 8-   Nietzsche’s gives us an idea of ‘ubermensch’ i.e superman because he believed that there is no God present anywhere. Or ‘God is dead’. So, we are free from the idea of God and we are free to establish our new values. And then the creator will be responsible for whatever he selects for his life so there is no chance to escape from suffering that comes from the values that he chooses for himself.

Video 9-   I like existentialism because it gives way to life as it gives space to the intellectual thinking and the existentialist thinkers are much more straight forward than others. Existentialism accepts one as he or she is.

My favourite video is- Video 2
I liked this video because a person commits suicide when he or she starts thinking and then gets undermined by his own thoughts and when he or she takes a pause while thinking than they discover the absurdity starts dying because they have recognised even instinctively the ridiculous character of that habit.

Flipped learning is a very helpful process to understand. It is so because while doing flipped learning we don’t have to sit in one place and give our ears to the teachers, it is a self-learning easy process. It makes our concept more clear.

Thinking Activity on The Waste Land

      Thinking activity on 'The Waste Land'



1> Friedrich Nietzsche mentions the concept of ‘The Ubermensch’, which means- the superior man; who justifies the existence of the human race and also it means as a goal which is set for humanity. Nietzsche’s idea is different from that of Eliot that is in the way- Nietzsche thought that a bit of morality can lead towards different world whereas Eliot dealt with ‘past, present and Modern world’ in the poem ‘The Waste Land’. Eliot pointed out that spiritual salvation can be achieved by following the Buddha philosophy.
2> For you the salvation of the man lies in the preservation of the cultural tradition, which, in our more mature years, lives with great vigour within us than does primitiveness, and which we must preserve if chaos is to avoided. This was said to Eliot because Freud importance to free outlet of basic instinct. As it was considered to be the basic desire and so there’s nothing wrong in it. This thing brought Western society to face chaotic life and this thing brought to spiritual degradation, people burning with lust and many more profanity in society.
          So, Eliot had to write- salvation of man lies in the preservation of the cultural tradition to revive faith in God, and in this way gave solution to the preservation of cultural tradition. Eliot and Freud gave their own views in this regard. It is true that the free vent to the repressed primitive lead to a happy life but it had to be in a limited way. The problem is that Freud what people are upto. So, both the views are important but in a limits.

3>
The Indian allusions are of “Ganga”, “Himavat”, “Data”, “Dayadhvam”, “Damyata” and “Shantih, Shantih, Shantih”. He makes use of Indian allusions in the last part- which symbolically means that he looks to Indian Spirituality for the solutions to his questions. Data means be a giver, what have you given? Dayadhvam means sympathy for others. Damyata means Self- control. He ends his poem with the lines Shantih, Shantih, Shantih which had been taken from Upanishad.
                                                                                         


Pehredaar Piya Ki the most controversial serial


Pehredaar Piya Ki- the serial




   
           The serial “Pehredaar Piya Ki” does portrays a 10years old boy married to a girl of 19 years, here I question the people why do you find the serial hurting your moral sentiments? Why do you suggest your children not to watch this serial and on which ground do you find it obnoxious or aghast? Why don’t we remember those days when we were in support of these types of acts which were performed by the people of India with great pomp and show? And while you read these questions then you would think that at that time we were not so educated or not so capable to raise our voice against those acts, at that time also we did have our sentiments. Or now we can say that in today’s world we are not educated rather our sentiments are getting educated everyday.
       We are unable to accept this particular serial because it shows the relation between 10 years old boy and 19 years old girl, if it’s so then why are we supporting the daily soaps of Ekta Kapoor to get name and fame with every passing days? Why parents don’t stop their children from watching those serials, it’s so because parents are also blind followers of Ekta Kapoor’s daily soaps. Had it been today Ekta Kapoor’s one of the daily soaps then starting from the small screen television actors or actresses to parents everyone would had readily accepted it because Ekta Kapoor always portrays facts and realities rather than other Directors or Producers and she gives platform to every newcomers in the industry. Everyone is comparing this serial with Balika Vadhu serial which was aired on Colors channel saying that Balika Vadhu portrayed reality and this serial is just ashaming  the Indian society and culture in the grounds of portraying reality but are we all well-accustomed with each and every small history of India? The answer is a big ‘NO’ because we only see what we want to see and portray those things which would bring a bit of fame and attention to India from other country people.
    We say patriarchy has been eradicated from the Indian society, if it’s so then why we are unable to digest a serial portraying a girl protecting a boy? It’s so because till today from our mind patriarchy has not been eradicated totally that’s why we are able to find many loop holes in this serial. Women are still not empowered in India in its true sense. If we can have patience for Ekta Kapoor’s daily soaps years after years so why are we unable to have patience for this serial and why can’t we wait for the story to unfold in the upcoming days? Last but not the least when parents want to curtail this serial than they should start from the very root that is from Ekta Kapoor to all the Hollywood and Bollywood movies which children watch with great enthusiasm with their support. It’s not always necessary that if one finds a loop hole we all should come to an abrupt conclusion without giving a second thought. Indian media always jumps to a conclusion for the purpose of name and fame without thinking for the Country and its people. People educate yourself not your sentiments than only India would progress in its true sense. 


Thursday, 29 June 2017

Movie reviews of Charlie Chaplin's- The Modernist and The Great Dictator


The Modernist




This movie is based on the life of a worker in a factory in the Modern times. The main protagonist and director of the movie is Charlie Chaplin, here through this movie he tried to show the depraved condition of the people of those times. He through this movie showed how the people of those times became unlike “machines”. It seemed that the people couldn’t do anything according to oneself; they just became mere puppets in the hands of the powerful people.
 At first, we can see an image of a clock, which showed that with its single stroke how people start their day without thinking anything. Here we can also sense how unemployment leads people to greed and incompetence. It can be well seen through the gamin girl named Ellen, who in order to survive steals food from different places for her brothers, sister and an unemployed father. As Chaplin was a poor boy in the movie he couldn’t raise his voice against the wrongs and while working in the factory his mindset became such that without tools in his hands he used to turn the bolts of the plates. This movie satirically showcased the shrewd fact of unemployment which leads to misery in starting of the Modern Age.



The Great Dictator
                                This is another produced by Charlie Chaplin which satirizes the rule of Adolf Hitler. In this movie he played dual personalities and roles that are one of a Jewish barber and another of Hitler. It is about the conflict between two communities that are Jews and Aryans. Here the poor barber survived in a bad condition because people thought him as Hitler. It showcased the rule of Hitler which devastated the whole of the place.
                 At the end of his speech he asked people not to fight for slavery, whereas, fight for “Liberty”. It is so because liberty a man can’t take with him if he wants after his death even one wants; it stays in a particular culture for forever if it gets imbibed in it once.

                  Lastly, after watching these two movies from my own perspective I want to say that- until and unless we decide to get crucified in the hands of the powerful people, none can crucify us.





Monday, 26 June 2017

My views on Modernist Poetry->

Hello readers,
  This blog is one of the activities of our academics. And this time it is based on Modernist Literature. Here I have tried to interpret ten Modern poems according to my understanding.
        Before proceeding forward here I put a brief description of what is Modernism??
        ->Modernism is a philosophical movement that, along with cultural trends and changes, arose from wide-scale and far-reaching transformations in Western society during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Among the factors that shaped modernism were the development of modern industrial societies and the rapid growth of cities, followed then by reactions of horror to World War I. Modernism also rejected the certainty of Enlightenment thinking, and many modernists rejected religious belief.

Here below are given my interpretations-

1> “The Embankment”- T. E. Hulme
Once, in finesse of fiddles found I ecstasy,
In a flash of gold heels on the hard pavement.
Now see I
That warmth’s the very stuff of poesy.
Oh, God, make small
The old star-eaten blanket of the sky,
That I may fold it round me and in comfort lie.

  Here the poet says that once he was in very good condition with gold heels on the hard pavement. But now he is on pavement having flashbacks of his well-beings facing hard times. He asks God for the old star-eaten blanket at least to comfort himself in his hard times. Here the Star is symbolised as a sign of sorrow and it can also be compared to a moth-eaten blanket which is unattractive. In his grief he forgets the beauty of the romantic starry sky and also makes it as an image to represent his sorrows.


2> “Darkness” - Joseph Campbell
       Darkness
        I stop to watch a star shine
        in the boghole -
        A star no longer, but a silver
         ribbon of light.
        I look at it and pass on.

The title of the poem says everything about the poem. This short poem of four (4) lines by Joseph Campbell shows somewhat of ignorance of the Modernists for the Victorian Age. In this poem we can visualize that how the poet just passes a glance on the sky and moves on thinking that the star is no more a star now it’s just has become a mere image of silver ribbon of light in the dark sky.  Here star as a metaphor indicates the deteriorated Victorian Age.

3> Image” - Edward Storer
       Forsaken lovers,
       Burning to a chaste white moon
       Upon strange Pyres of loneliness and
       drought.

In this poem we can sense the deteriorated position of the Victorian Age. Forsaken lovers the term can be very rightly referred to the Victorian Age because the age after the World War became abandoned and shattered utterly. The whole of Victorian ideas, principles and everything got shattered in such a way that the Modernists didn’t pay a heed to it and formed their own.

4> "In a station of the Metro" - Ezra Pound
         The apparition of these faces in the
          Crowd;
          Petals on a wet, black bough

There were many developments in the Modern Age and it becomes clear when we see the use of Metro as a symbol used by the poet. Here the poet says about the ghost like faces (apparition) of the crowd which has become because of their unenthusiastic spirit due to their busy life. The line ‘petal on a wet, black bough’ represents people as petal which is increasing with the passing time and black bough as society which is tolerating the burden.

5> “The Pool”- Hilda Doolittle
       Are you alive?
       I touch you
       You quiver trembling like a sea-fish
       I cover you with my net
       What are you- banded one?

The title “The Pool” represents water. Here the poet asks that are you alive? It is so because the water is stagnant and whenever anything is asked to the people they shiver like a sea-fish as if their life has got stuck in a net. It happened because of their unenthusiastic and busy life and they seemed to be like living dead. At the end the poet asks- “What are you?” Are you yourself or under somebody’s control?

6> "Insouciance" – Richard Aldington
       In and out of the dreary trenches
       Trudging cheerily under the stars
       I make for myself little poems
       Delicate as a flock of doves
       They fly away like white-winged
        Doves.


In this poem there are many images like “dreary trenches” which means a dark hole or dug in the ground, it is used as metaphors for the ups and downs of life. There are other words like “trudging” and “cheerily” which represents the image of a person who has to do his work but he don’t want to do. Here poet focused upon the ups and downs of life during the rough time of a person.

7> Morning at the Window” - T. S. Eliot
They are rattling breakfast plates in basement kitchens,
And along the trampled edges of the street
I am aware of the damp souls of housemaid
Sprouting despondently at area gates.

The brown waves of fog toss up to me
Twisted faces from the bottom of the street,
And tear from a passer-by with muddy skirts
An aimless smile that hovers in the air
 And vanishes along the level of the roofs.

Morning at the window is an image of poverty. The picture is that of a slum where people lead miserable lives. The speaker is at the window. The images in the poem correlate with the idea of poverty and feelings of sympathy.  The speaker says that he is aware of the condition of the household minds and souls or their psychology. He also mentions about the people with sad faces and also notices tear in the eyes of a passer-by with muddy skirt, which clearly shows that the passer-by was not happy with her life. Then again he finds smiles in very few faces which are also not so happy and it gets vanished till they walk the street.

8> The Red Wheelbarrow” -William Carlos Williams
so much depends
 upon
a red wheel
barrow
 glazed with rain
water
beside the white
chicken.

The speaker sees that wheelbarrow is red. Red probably suggests things like life, blood, courage and zeal that are part of what the farmer sustains and support. The wheel barrow is one thing to us. The poet has separated the wheel and barrow here barrow consider as a body. The barrow depends on the wheel. The wheel consider as a life. The theme of dependence and interdependence can be extended in every direction. The chickens are white, it suggested that it is pure and sacred. There is also peace in this natural and simple mode of a farmer. It may also remind readers of innocence. The word ‘rainwater’ is split into two to make us see them separately and in turns, and appreciate them. The gazing wheelbarrow bathed with natural water of rain and white chickens create a simple but significant imagery. If we look at the poem with different angle that A Christian reader may interpret the red as the blood of Christ. And the white relates with sacredness.

9> Anecdote of the Jar- Wallace Stevens
I placed a jar in Tennessee,  
And round it was, upon a hill.  
It made the slovenly wilderness  
Surround that hill.
The wilderness rose up to it,
And sprawled around, no longer wild.  
The jar was round upon the ground  
And tall and of a port in air.
It took dominion everywhere.  
The jar was gray and bare.
It did not give of bird or bush,  
Like nothing else in Tennessee.


Stevens explores the question of superiority between art and nature. Is nature superior to human creations or does human creativity surpasses nature in some way? This poem solves riddle by recognizing the unique differences between art and nature. The poem begins by telling us of an incident in the past. Once he kept a big and beautiful jar upon an untidy hill in Tennessee. The jar is an art object made by a human being, whereas the hill on which it is placed is natural. Stevens truly does a wonderful job of portraying the relationship of humans to nature. By using the jar to represent man, he was successful in creating an environment not only expressed in the poem, but also felt by the reader. He used irregular rhymes and role changes to express the complex relationship. The reader is left with confusion but slight understanding of the relationship. Stevens expressed the relationship of humans to nature very well in this piece of work.

10> ‘l (a‘- E. E. Cummings
l(a... (a leaf falls on loneliness)
l(a
le
af
fa
ll
s)
one
l
iness


The title of the poem “A leaf falls on loneliness” shows itself the state of being alone and solitude. There is a word “fall” which represents the state of dullness. It can be fall of civilization, individual’s hope or fall of anything else. If a leaf falls from tree then the fallen leaf become lonely. In Modernist Literature we can see fall of spirituality and also fall of hope. Loneliness represents the separation from the entire world. So here we can say that this poem represents the state of separation from the entire world and also represents the state of self centeredness.